Back to the work library

Rebuilding purchasing controls during an ERP migration

Buying was spread across more than a hundred people before there was a single approval pipeline.

careerEvidence: reportedCase study
Where
Purchasing and operations
Built from
2026-01
Source copy reviewed
Evidence status
Source copy checked on 8 September 2026. These historical statements have not been independently re-verified for this website.
On this page

The problem

An operations team moving onto a new ERP had purchasing spread across more than a hundred people, before there was a single approval pipeline.

The previous process

Buying was spread across more than a hundred people with no single approval pipeline. No before-and-after measure is published here. I reviewed invoices and spend over four months and used the findings to set the purchasing controls.

My role

I led the purchasing-control work in my logistics role: reviewing the process, setting approval thresholds, introducing receiving controls and writing the procedures.

What was built

The approval pipeline, with documented thresholds and an audit trail, is in use. So is the three-way match across purchase order, delivery receipt and invoice, with delivery receipts added as a control point at the receiving yard.

I wrote a versioned SOP library of more than thirty documents with role acknowledgment and set up lien waiver capture under Florida Statute 713. The daily operations brief to leadership informed the business metrics and reporting platform.

How it works

A request enters the approval pipeline before money is committed. The receiving record is then checked against the purchase order and invoice. Documented thresholds define who approves the purchase; versioned procedures and acknowledgments give the team a common reference.

Evidence

The record: deployed, used, measured
EvidenceDated account
DeployedControls in use at the company.
UsedBuyers and office.
MeasuredMy own account, with no third-party corroboration.

Deployed: the controls are in use at the company. Used: by the buyers and the office, uncounted. Measured: nothing published.

Every claim is my own account, self-confirmed against my own files, with no third-party corroboration.

Observed results

No business-outcome measure is published here. The share of invoices arriving with a matching purchase order and the number of people authorized to commit spend would be useful measures.

What this does not show

The audit covered four months of invoices and spend. The career statements are my own account, checked against my files, with no third-party corroboration. Vendor pricing work is described without confidential figures. No public measurement of savings or control effectiveness is claimed.

Relevant next action

The workflow review covers one named process. The business metrics and reporting platform followed the daily brief.